Egypt vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Egypt
18.40 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Latvia
20.37 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Egypt rank
73rd
Latvia rank
71st

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Egypt
  • Latvia
050.0M100.0M150.0M199220082025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 20.37 million BoP, current US$ against 18.40 million BoP, current US$ in Egypt, a difference of 1.97 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 71st of 154 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 49.75 million BoP, current US$ 2.05 million BoP, current US$ 47.70 million BoP, current US$ Egypt
2010s 1.10 million BoP, current US$ 19.06 million BoP, current US$ 17.96 million BoP, current US$ Latvia
2020s 68.70 million BoP, current US$ 13.81 million BoP, current US$ 54.89 million BoP, current US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Egypt or Latvia?
Latvia, at 20.37 million BoP, current US$ against 18.40 million BoP, current US$ in Egypt as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Egypt and Latvia?
1.97 million BoP, current US$, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Latvia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
How do Egypt and Latvia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Egypt ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 71st of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/egypt-arab-rep/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/egypt-arab-rep/latvia/">Egypt vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,588 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) with 155 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.