Denmark vs IBRD only: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Denmark
8.61 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
IBRD only
21.69 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Denmark rank
13th
IBRD only rank
12th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Denmark
  • IBRD only
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B196219932025

How they compare

IBRD only currently reports 21.69 billion BoP, current US$ against 8.61 billion BoP, current US$ in Denmark, a difference of 13.08 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes IBRD only's figure about 2.5 times Denmark's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 13th and IBRD only ranks 12th of 154 countries.

IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark IBRD only Difference Ahead
2000s 1.91 billion BoP, current US$ 2.57 billion BoP, current US$ 662.93 million BoP, current US$ IBRD only
2010s 2.70 billion BoP, current US$ 6.50 billion BoP, current US$ 3.81 billion BoP, current US$ IBRD only
2020s 6.15 billion BoP, current US$ 18.25 billion BoP, current US$ 12.10 billion BoP, current US$ IBRD only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Denmark or IBRD only?
IBRD only, at 21.69 billion BoP, current US$ against 8.61 billion BoP, current US$ in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Denmark and IBRD only?
13.08 billion BoP, current US$, with IBRD only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and IBRD only?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Denmark and IBRD only rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Denmark ranks 13th and IBRD only ranks 12th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs IBRD only: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/denmark/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/denmark/ibrd-only/">Denmark vs IBRD only: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,588 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) with 155 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.