Bolivia vs Tuvalu: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time
- Bolivia
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 14,829 BoP, current US$ against 11,888 BoP, current US$ in Bolivia, a difference of 2,941 BoP, current US$.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.2 times Bolivia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Bolivia has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 144th and Tuvalu ranks 142nd of 154 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.97 million BoP, current US$ | 19,663 BoP, current US$ | 1.95 million BoP, current US$ | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 8.40 million BoP, current US$ | 17,480 BoP, current US$ | 8.38 million BoP, current US$ | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Bolivia or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 14,829 BoP, current US$ against 11,888 BoP, current US$ in Bolivia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Bolivia and Tuvalu?
- 2,941 BoP, current US$, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Tuvalu?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2012.
- How do Bolivia and Tuvalu rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
- Bolivia ranks 144th and Tuvalu ranks 142nd of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) with 155 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.