Australia vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Australia
7.27 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics
5.60 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Australia rank
16th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
19th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Australia
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B198920072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 7.27 billion BoP, current US$ against 5.60 billion BoP, current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 1.67 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 16th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 19th of 154 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Central Europe and the Baltics in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1990s 249.58 million BoP, current US$ 116.24 million BoP, current US$ 133.34 million BoP, current US$ Australia
2000s 553.01 million BoP, current US$ 1.04 billion BoP, current US$ 490.91 million BoP, current US$ Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s 1.26 billion BoP, current US$ 3.10 billion BoP, current US$ 1.83 billion BoP, current US$ Central Europe and the Baltics
2020s 4.83 billion BoP, current US$ 4.72 billion BoP, current US$ 106.54 million BoP, current US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Australia or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Australia, at 7.27 billion BoP, current US$ against 5.60 billion BoP, current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Australia and Central Europe and the Baltics?
1.67 billion BoP, current US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central Europe and the Baltics?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Australia ranks 16th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 19th of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/australia/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/australia/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Australia vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,588 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) with 155 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.