Africa Western and Central vs Malaysia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Africa Western and Central
185.73 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Malaysia
347.67 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Africa Western and Central rank
38th
Malaysia rank
37th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Africa Western and Central
  • Malaysia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197419992025

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 347.67 million BoP, current US$ against 185.73 million BoP, current US$ in Africa Western and Central, a difference of 161.94 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.9 times Africa Western and Central's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Africa Western and Central ranks 38th and Malaysia ranks 37th of 47 groups.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Western and Central Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 3.35 million BoP, current US$ 14.74 million BoP, current US$ 11.38 million BoP, current US$ Malaysia
2000s 1.34 million BoP, current US$ 66.80 million BoP, current US$ 65.46 million BoP, current US$ Malaysia
2010s 25.23 million BoP, current US$ 154.88 million BoP, current US$ 129.65 million BoP, current US$ Malaysia
2020s 36.36 million BoP, current US$ 287.27 million BoP, current US$ 250.90 million BoP, current US$ Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Africa Western and Central or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 347.67 million BoP, current US$ against 185.73 million BoP, current US$ in Africa Western and Central as of 2024.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Africa Western and Central and Malaysia?
161.94 million BoP, current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Western and Central and Malaysia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do Africa Western and Central and Malaysia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Africa Western and Central ranks 38th and Malaysia ranks 37th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Western and Central vs Malaysia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/africa-western-and-central/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/africa-western-and-central/malaysia/">Africa Western and Central vs Malaysia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,588 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) with 155 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.