East Asia & Pacific vs Georgia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

East Asia & Pacific
12.47 % change on previous year
in 2025
Georgia
64.43 % change on previous year
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific rank
18th
Georgia rank
21st

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Georgia
0200400600800197720012025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 64.43 % change on previous year against 12.47 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 51.96 % change on previous year.

That makes Georgia's figure about 5.2 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Georgia ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 18th and Georgia ranks 21st of 47 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 11.01 % change on previous year 12.72 % change on previous year 1.71 % change on previous year Georgia
2010s 10.28 % change on previous year 2.31 % change on previous year 7.97 % change on previous year East Asia & Pacific
2020s 5.74 % change on previous year 132.73 % change on previous year 126.99 % change on previous year Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), East Asia & Pacific or Georgia?
Georgia, at 64.43 % change on previous year against 12.47 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between East Asia & Pacific and Georgia?
51.96 % change on previous year, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Georgia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Georgia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 18th and Georgia ranks 21st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Georgia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific/georgia/">East Asia & Pacific vs Georgia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 5,940 data points, 1963–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.