Central Europe and the Baltics vs French Polynesia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Central Europe and the Baltics
2.86 % change on previous year
in 2025
French Polynesia
63.39 % change on previous year
in 2016
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
24th
French Polynesia rank
22nd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • French Polynesia
-1000100200199120082025

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 63.39 % change on previous year against 2.86 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 60.53 % change on previous year.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 22.2 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2003 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 24th and French Polynesia ranks 22nd of 47 groups.

Central Europe and the Baltics has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics French Polynesia Difference Ahead
2000s 32.81 % change on previous year 13.46 % change on previous year 19.34 % change on previous year Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s 4.14 % change on previous year 1.69 % change on previous year 2.45 % change on previous year Central Europe and the Baltics

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Central Europe and the Baltics or French Polynesia?
French Polynesia, at 63.39 % change on previous year against 2.86 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2016.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Central Europe and the Baltics and French Polynesia?
60.53 % change on previous year, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and French Polynesia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and French Polynesia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 24th and French Polynesia ranks 22nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs French Polynesia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-annual-growth-rate/central-europe-and-the-baltics/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-annual-growth-rate/central-europe-and-the-baltics/french-polynesia/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs French Polynesia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 5,940 data points, 1963–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.