Burundi vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Burundi
674.07 % change on previous year
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
70.34 % change on previous year
in 2025
Burundi rank
3rd
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
4th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Burundi
  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
02505007501.0k197720012025

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 674.07 % change on previous year against 70.34 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 603.73 % change on previous year.

That makes Burundi's figure about 9.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

Burundi ranks 3rd and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th of 145 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2010s 151.44 % change on previous year 9.58 % change on previous year 141.86 % change on previous year Burundi
2020s 292.71 % change on previous year 19.22 % change on previous year 273.49 % change on previous year Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Burundi or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
Burundi, at 674.07 % change on previous year against 70.34 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Burundi and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
603.73 % change on previous year, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
How do Burundi and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Burundi ranks 3rd and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-annual-growth-rate/burundi/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-annual-growth-rate/burundi/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/">Burundi vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 5,940 data points, 1963–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.