Kenya vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments

Kenya
65.48 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Latvia
66.71 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Kenya rank
90th
Latvia rank
89th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments over time

  • Kenya
  • Latvia
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M198720062025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 66.71 million BoP, current US$ against 65.48 million BoP, current US$ in Kenya, a difference of 1.23 million BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 89th of 171 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 53.75 million BoP, current US$ 3.07 million BoP, current US$ 50.68 million BoP, current US$ Kenya
2000s 24.84 million BoP, current US$ 30.25 million BoP, current US$ 5.42 million BoP, current US$ Latvia
2010s 104.06 million BoP, current US$ 45.61 million BoP, current US$ 58.45 million BoP, current US$ Kenya
2020s 53.57 million BoP, current US$ 39.46 million BoP, current US$ 14.12 million BoP, current US$ Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments, Kenya or Latvia?
Latvia, at 66.71 million BoP, current US$ against 65.48 million BoP, current US$ in Kenya as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments between Kenya and Latvia?
1.23 million BoP, current US$, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Latvia?
23 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Kenya and Latvia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments?
Kenya ranks 90th and Latvia ranks 89th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments. Statizoid, drawing on Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us/kenya/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us/kenya/latvia/">Kenya vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
218 places, 7,763 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of proprietary rights (such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, industrial processes and designs including trade secrets, franchises), and charges for licenses to reproduce or distribute (or both) intellectual property embodied in produced originals or prototypes (such as copyrights on books and manuscripts, computer software, cinematographic works, and sound recordings) and related rights (such as for live performances and television, cable, or satellite broadcast). This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.