Curaçao vs Namibia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments

Curaçao
26.06 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Namibia
24.48 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Curaçao rank
103rd
Namibia rank
106th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments over time

  • Curaçao
  • Namibia
010.0M20.0M30.0M199020072024

How they compare

Curaçao currently reports 26.06 million BoP, current US$ against 24.48 million BoP, current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 1.58 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Curaçao's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Curaçao has been ahead every year.

Curaçao ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 106th of 171 countries.

Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curaçao Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 26.77 million BoP, current US$ 5.18 million BoP, current US$ 21.60 million BoP, current US$ Curaçao
2020s 28.34 million BoP, current US$ 7.49 million BoP, current US$ 20.85 million BoP, current US$ Curaçao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments, Curaçao or Namibia?
Curaçao, at 26.06 million BoP, current US$ against 24.48 million BoP, current US$ in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments between Curaçao and Namibia?
1.58 million BoP, current US$, with Curaçao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Namibia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curaçao and Namibia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments?
Curaçao ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 106th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curaçao vs Namibia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments. Statizoid, drawing on Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us/curacao/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us/curacao/namibia/">Curaçao vs Namibia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
218 places, 7,763 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of proprietary rights (such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, industrial processes and designs including trade secrets, franchises), and charges for licenses to reproduce or distribute (or both) intellectual property embodied in produced originals or prototypes (such as copyrights on books and manuscripts, computer software, cinematographic works, and sound recordings) and related rights (such as for live performances and television, cable, or satellite broadcast). This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.