Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.005 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Malta
0.0439 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
5th
Malta rank
3rd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Malta
00.050.10.150.2197319992025

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0439 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.005 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0.0389 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malta's figure about 8.9 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 3rd of 47 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 0.001 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0021 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0011 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP Malta
2000s 0.0034 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0361 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0327 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP Malta
2010s 0.0055 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.067 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0615 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP Malta
2020s 0.0052 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0482 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0429 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Central Europe and the Baltics or Malta?
Malta, at 0.0439 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.005 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2024.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
0.0389 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Malta rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Malta ranks 3rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/malta/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Malta: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 7,741 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.