Mali vs Tajikistan: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)
Mali
1.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Tajikistan
1.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
161st
Tajikistan rank
162nd
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time
- Mali
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Mali currently reports 1.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Mali ranks 161st and Tajikistan ranks 162nd of 168 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Mali or Tajikistan?
- Mali, at 1.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tajikistan as of 2010.
- What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Mali and Tajikistan?
- 0.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Tajikistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2009.
- How do Mali and Tajikistan rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
- Mali ranks 161st and Tajikistan ranks 162nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.