Hong Kong vs OECD members: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Hong Kong
1.75 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
13,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
6th
OECD members rank
3rd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Hong Kong
  • OECD members
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.75 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 13,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 1.74 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 125.2 times OECD members's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 6th and OECD members ranks 3rd of 168 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong OECD members Difference Ahead
1990s 389,252 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,462 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 387,789 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 1.06 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,580 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.05 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 1.87 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,272 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 1.84 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,728 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.83 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Hong Kong or OECD members?
Hong Kong, at 1.75 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 13,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Hong Kong and OECD members?
1.74 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and OECD members?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and OECD members rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Hong Kong ranks 6th and OECD members ranks 3rd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs OECD members: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/">Hong Kong vs OECD members: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 7,369 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.