Germany vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Germany
70,521 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
77,895 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
18th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
17th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Germany
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197119972023

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 77,895 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 70,521 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Germany, a difference of 7,374 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.1 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

Germany ranks 18th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 17th of 168 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 1 and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
2010s 32,554 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 37,482 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,927 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 60,942 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 47,994 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,948 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Germany or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 77,895 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 70,521 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Germany as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Germany and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
7,374 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Germany and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Germany ranks 18th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 17th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/germany/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/germany/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Germany vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 7,369 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.