China vs Lithuania: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

China
4,551 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania
3,843 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
57th
Lithuania rank
60th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • China
  • Lithuania
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199420082023

How they compare

China currently reports 4,551 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,843 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 708 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Lithuania ahead.

China ranks 57th and Lithuania ranks 60th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 62.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 132.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 70.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 595.53 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 319.55 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 275.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 2,493 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 836.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,657 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre China
2020s 4,579 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,996 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 583.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), China or Lithuania?
China, at 4,551 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,843 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between China and Lithuania?
708 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lithuania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do China and Lithuania rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
China ranks 57th and Lithuania ranks 60th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Lithuania: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/lithuania/">China vs Lithuania: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 7,369 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.