Chile vs Norway: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Chile
1,852 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
1,773 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
70th
Norway rank
72nd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Chile
  • Norway
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197519992023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1,852 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,773 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Norway ahead.

Chile ranks 70th and Norway ranks 72nd of 168 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 17.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 166.6 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 149.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 42.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 302.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 260.49 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 141.81 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 761.96 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 620.15 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 526.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,033 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 505.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 1,969 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,271 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 301.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 2,037 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,754 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 282.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Chile or Norway?
Chile, at 1,852 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,773 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Chile and Norway?
79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Norway?
44 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Chile and Norway rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Chile ranks 70th and Norway ranks 72nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Norway: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/norway/">Chile vs Norway: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 7,369 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.