Aruba vs Denmark: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Aruba
35,487 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark
58,525 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
23rd
Denmark rank
20th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Aruba
  • Denmark
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199920112023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 58,525 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 35,487 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 23,038 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.6 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 23rd and Denmark ranks 20th of 168 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 57,880 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26,482 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 31,398 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 76,813 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 38,299 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 38,514 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 59,945 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 47,252 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,693 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Aruba or Denmark?
Denmark, at 58,525 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 35,487 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Aruba and Denmark?
23,038 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Denmark?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Denmark rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Aruba ranks 23rd and Denmark ranks 20th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Denmark: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/denmark/">Aruba vs Denmark: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 7,369 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.