IBRD only vs South Korea: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

IBRD only
23.63 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
South Korea
273.64 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
IBRD only rank
21st
South Korea rank
20th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • IBRD only
  • South Korea
0100200300196019922025

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 273.64 BoP, current US$ per person against 23.63 BoP, current US$ per person in IBRD only, a difference of 250.01 BoP, current US$ per person.

That makes South Korea's figure about 11.6 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was IBRD only ahead.

IBRD only ranks 21st and South Korea ranks 20th of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IBRD only averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only South Korea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2149 BoP, current US$ per person 0.0478 BoP, current US$ per person 0.1671 BoP, current US$ per person IBRD only
1980s 0.3283 BoP, current US$ per person 10.06 BoP, current US$ per person 9.73 BoP, current US$ per person South Korea
1990s 0.9225 BoP, current US$ per person 45.68 BoP, current US$ per person 44.76 BoP, current US$ per person South Korea
2000s 4.97 BoP, current US$ per person 94.82 BoP, current US$ per person 89.85 BoP, current US$ per person South Korea
2010s 14.59 BoP, current US$ per person 186.01 BoP, current US$ per person 171.42 BoP, current US$ per person South Korea
2020s 21.51 BoP, current US$ per person 222.01 BoP, current US$ per person 200.5 BoP, current US$ per person South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), IBRD only or South Korea?
South Korea, at 273.64 BoP, current US$ per person against 23.63 BoP, current US$ per person in IBRD only as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between IBRD only and South Korea?
250.01 BoP, current US$ per person, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and South Korea?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do IBRD only and South Korea rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
IBRD only ranks 21st and South Korea ranks 20th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs South Korea: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-capita/ibrd-only/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-capita/ibrd-only/korea-rep/">IBRD only vs South Korea: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,763 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.