China vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

China
33.15 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
Latvia
36.1 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
China rank
78th
Latvia rank
75th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • China
  • Latvia
010203040199220082025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 36.1 BoP, current US$ per person against 33.15 BoP, current US$ per person in China, a difference of 2.95 BoP, current US$ per person.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Latvia ahead.

China ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 75th of 171 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4706 BoP, current US$ per person 2.45 BoP, current US$ per person 1.98 BoP, current US$ per person Latvia
2000s 8.05 BoP, current US$ per person 13.99 BoP, current US$ per person 5.94 BoP, current US$ per person Latvia
2010s 16.95 BoP, current US$ per person 22.97 BoP, current US$ per person 6.02 BoP, current US$ per person Latvia
2020s 31.25 BoP, current US$ per person 23.49 BoP, current US$ per person 7.76 BoP, current US$ per person China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), China or Latvia?
Latvia, at 36.1 BoP, current US$ per person against 33.15 BoP, current US$ per person in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between China and Latvia?
2.95 BoP, current US$ per person, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do China and Latvia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
China ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 75th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-capita/china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-capita/china/latvia/">China vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,763 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.