China vs Georgia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

China
33.15 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
Georgia
35.53 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
China rank
78th
Georgia rank
77th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • China
  • Georgia
010203040199720112025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 35.53 BoP, current US$ per person against 33.15 BoP, current US$ per person in China, a difference of 2.38 BoP, current US$ per person.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.

China ranks 78th and Georgia ranks 77th of 171 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 4.27 BoP, current US$ per person 1.86 BoP, current US$ per person 2.41 BoP, current US$ per person China
2010s 16.95 BoP, current US$ per person 4.68 BoP, current US$ per person 12.26 BoP, current US$ per person China
2020s 31.25 BoP, current US$ per person 25.37 BoP, current US$ per person 5.89 BoP, current US$ per person China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), China or Georgia?
Georgia, at 35.53 BoP, current US$ per person against 33.15 BoP, current US$ per person in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between China and Georgia?
2.38 BoP, current US$ per person, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Georgia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do China and Georgia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
China ranks 78th and Georgia ranks 77th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Georgia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-capita/china/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-capita/china/georgia/">China vs Georgia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,763 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.