Australia vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Australia
448.03 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics
137.13 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
Australia rank
11th
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
8th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Australia
  • Central Europe and the Baltics
0100200300400198920072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 448.03 BoP, current US$ per person against 137.13 BoP, current US$ per person in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 310.9 BoP, current US$ per person.

That makes Australia's figure about 3.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 11th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 8th of 171 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central Europe and the Baltics Difference Ahead
1990s 55.39 BoP, current US$ per person 3.45 BoP, current US$ per person 51.93 BoP, current US$ per person Australia
2000s 94.89 BoP, current US$ per person 30.19 BoP, current US$ per person 64.69 BoP, current US$ per person Australia
2010s 181.1 BoP, current US$ per person 77.8 BoP, current US$ per person 103.3 BoP, current US$ per person Australia
2020s 332.87 BoP, current US$ per person 112.31 BoP, current US$ per person 220.55 BoP, current US$ per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Australia or Central Europe and the Baltics?
Australia, at 448.03 BoP, current US$ per person against 137.13 BoP, current US$ per person in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Australia and Central Europe and the Baltics?
310.9 BoP, current US$ per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central Europe and the Baltics?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Australia ranks 11th and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 8th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-capita/australia/central-europe-and-the-baltics/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-per-capita/australia/central-europe-and-the-baltics/">Australia vs Central Europe and the Baltics: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,763 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.