Rwanda vs Tajikistan: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time
- Rwanda
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 297,222 BoP, current US$ against 36,960 BoP, current US$ in Tajikistan, a difference of 260,262 BoP, current US$.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 8.0 times Tajikistan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 164th and Tajikistan ranks 167th of 171 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 209,651 BoP, current US$ | 36,010 BoP, current US$ | 173,641 BoP, current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 249,828 BoP, current US$ | 89,734 BoP, current US$ | 160,094 BoP, current US$ | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Rwanda or Tajikistan?
- Rwanda, at 297,222 BoP, current US$ against 36,960 BoP, current US$ in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Rwanda and Tajikistan?
- 260,262 BoP, current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tajikistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Tajikistan rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
- Rwanda ranks 164th and Tajikistan ranks 167th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) with 93 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.