Malta vs New Zealand: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Malta
1.10 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
New Zealand
1.12 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Malta rank
44th
New Zealand rank
42nd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Malta
  • New Zealand
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197319992025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.12 billion BoP, current US$ against 1.10 billion BoP, current US$ in Malta, a difference of 22.20 million BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.

Malta ranks 44th and New Zealand ranks 42nd of 171 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 303.06 million BoP, current US$ 485.16 million BoP, current US$ 182.10 million BoP, current US$ New Zealand
2010s 774.88 million BoP, current US$ 910.38 million BoP, current US$ 135.51 million BoP, current US$ New Zealand
2020s 974.62 million BoP, current US$ 1.08 billion BoP, current US$ 101.96 million BoP, current US$ New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Malta or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.12 billion BoP, current US$ against 1.10 billion BoP, current US$ in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Malta and New Zealand?
22.20 million BoP, current US$, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Zealand?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Malta and New Zealand rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Malta ranks 44th and New Zealand ranks 42nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs New Zealand: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/malta/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/malta/new-zealand/">Malta vs New Zealand: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,856 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) with 93 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.