Lithuania vs Macao: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Lithuania
293.96 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Macao
303.38 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Lithuania rank
63rd
Macao rank
62nd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Lithuania
  • Macao
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199420092025

How they compare

Macao currently reports 303.38 million BoP, current US$ against 293.96 million BoP, current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 9.42 million BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 63rd and Macao ranks 62nd of 171 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Macao Difference Ahead
2000s 22.23 million BoP, current US$ 35.86 million BoP, current US$ 13.63 million BoP, current US$ Macao
2010s 52.40 million BoP, current US$ 225.43 million BoP, current US$ 173.03 million BoP, current US$ Macao
2020s 230.36 million BoP, current US$ 202.32 million BoP, current US$ 28.04 million BoP, current US$ Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Lithuania or Macao?
Macao, at 303.38 million BoP, current US$ against 293.96 million BoP, current US$ in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Lithuania and Macao?
9.42 million BoP, current US$, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Macao?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Macao rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Lithuania ranks 63rd and Macao ranks 62nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Macao: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/lithuania/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/lithuania/macao-sar-china/">Lithuania vs Macao: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,856 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) with 93 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.