Curacao vs Namibia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Curacao
26.06 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Namibia
24.48 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Curacao rank
103rd
Namibia rank
106th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Curacao
  • Namibia
010.0M20.0M30.0M199020072024

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 26.06 million BoP, current US$ against 24.48 million BoP, current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 1.58 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Curacao's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.

Curacao ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 106th of 171 countries.

Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 26.77 million BoP, current US$ 5.18 million BoP, current US$ 21.60 million BoP, current US$ Curacao
2020s 28.34 million BoP, current US$ 7.49 million BoP, current US$ 20.85 million BoP, current US$ Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Curacao or Namibia?
Curacao, at 26.06 million BoP, current US$ against 24.48 million BoP, current US$ in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Curacao and Namibia?
1.58 million BoP, current US$, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Namibia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curacao and Namibia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Curacao ranks 103rd and Namibia ranks 106th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Namibia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/curacao/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/curacao/namibia/">Curacao vs Namibia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,856 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) with 93 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.