China vs OECD members: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

China
46.63 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
OECD members
337.96 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
China rank
3rd
OECD members rank
3rd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • China
  • OECD members
0200.0B400.0B600.0B196019922025

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 337.96 billion BoP, current US$ against 46.63 billion BoP, current US$ in China, a difference of 291.33 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes OECD members's figure about 7.2 times China's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, OECD members has been ahead every year.

China ranks 3rd and OECD members ranks 3rd of 171 countries.

OECD members has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China OECD members Difference Ahead
1990s 585.00 million BoP, current US$ 48.79 billion BoP, current US$ 48.20 billion BoP, current US$ OECD members
2000s 5.59 billion BoP, current US$ 127.07 billion BoP, current US$ 121.48 billion BoP, current US$ OECD members
2010s 23.40 billion BoP, current US$ 293.60 billion BoP, current US$ 270.20 billion BoP, current US$ OECD members
2020s 44.08 billion BoP, current US$ 446.32 billion BoP, current US$ 402.25 billion BoP, current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), China or OECD members?
OECD members, at 337.96 billion BoP, current US$ against 46.63 billion BoP, current US$ in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between China and OECD members?
291.33 billion BoP, current US$, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and OECD members?
29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do China and OECD members rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
China ranks 3rd and OECD members ranks 3rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs OECD members: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/china/oecd-members/">China vs OECD members: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,856 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) with 93 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.