China vs Netherlands: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

China
46.63 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Netherlands
42.37 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
China rank
3rd
Netherlands rank
4th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • China
  • Netherlands
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B196719962025

How they compare

China currently reports 46.63 billion BoP, current US$ against 42.37 billion BoP, current US$ in Netherlands, a difference of 4.26 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Netherlands ahead.

China ranks 3rd and Netherlands ranks 4th of 171 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 585.00 million BoP, current US$ 3.06 billion BoP, current US$ 2.47 billion BoP, current US$ Netherlands
2000s 5.59 billion BoP, current US$ 18.32 billion BoP, current US$ 12.73 billion BoP, current US$ Netherlands
2010s 23.40 billion BoP, current US$ 46.37 billion BoP, current US$ 22.97 billion BoP, current US$ Netherlands
2020s 43.56 billion BoP, current US$ 43.11 billion BoP, current US$ 458.20 million BoP, current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), China or Netherlands?
China, at 46.63 billion BoP, current US$ against 42.37 billion BoP, current US$ in Netherlands as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between China and Netherlands?
4.26 billion BoP, current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Netherlands?
28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
How do China and Netherlands rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
China ranks 3rd and Netherlands ranks 4th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Netherlands: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/china/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/china/netherlands/">China vs Netherlands: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,856 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) with 93 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.