Bhutan vs Rwanda: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time
- Bhutan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 337,285 BoP, current US$ against 297,222 BoP, current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 40,063 BoP, current US$.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 162nd and Rwanda ranks 164th of 171 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 221,117 BoP, current US$ | 209,651 BoP, current US$ | 11,466 BoP, current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 95,646 BoP, current US$ | 249,828 BoP, current US$ | 154,182 BoP, current US$ | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Bhutan or Rwanda?
- Bhutan, at 337,285 BoP, current US$ against 297,222 BoP, current US$ in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Bhutan and Rwanda?
- 40,063 BoP, current US$, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Rwanda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Rwanda rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
- Bhutan ranks 162nd and Rwanda ranks 164th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) with 93 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.