Afghanistan vs Aruba: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)

Afghanistan
6.11 million BoP, current US$
in 2020
Aruba
6.39 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
132nd
Aruba rank
131st

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Aruba
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M199920112023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 6.39 million BoP, current US$ against 6.11 million BoP, current US$ in Afghanistan, a difference of 275,920 BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Aruba ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 132nd and Aruba ranks 131st of 171 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Aruba Difference Ahead
2000s 201,584 BoP, current US$ 12.57 million BoP, current US$ 12.37 million BoP, current US$ Aruba
2010s 10.41 million BoP, current US$ 13.83 million BoP, current US$ 3.42 million BoP, current US$ Aruba
2020s 6.11 million BoP, current US$ 10.21 million BoP, current US$ 4.10 million BoP, current US$ Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current), Afghanistan or Aruba?
Aruba, at 6.39 million BoP, current US$ against 6.11 million BoP, current US$ in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current) between Afghanistan and Aruba?
275,920 BoP, current US$, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Aruba?
13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
How do Afghanistan and Aruba rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (bop, current)?
Afghanistan ranks 132nd and Aruba ranks 131st of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Aruba: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/afghanistan/aruba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-payments-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/afghanistan/aruba/">Afghanistan vs Aruba: Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 7,856 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) with 93 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.