El Salvador vs Tunisia: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre

El Salvador
-14,898 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
-23,361 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
167th
Tunisia rank
170th

Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Tunisia
-20.0k020.0k40.0k196519942023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports -14,898 current US$ per square kilometre against -23,361 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 8,463 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 167th and Tunisia ranks 170th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 349.93 current US$ per square kilometre 76.75 current US$ per square kilometre 273.18 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 1,287 current US$ per square kilometre 238.32 current US$ per square kilometre 1,048 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 340.7 current US$ per square kilometre 722.55 current US$ per square kilometre 381.85 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 2,220 current US$ per square kilometre 998.98 current US$ per square kilometre 1,221 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 7,787 current US$ per square kilometre 1,325 current US$ per square kilometre 6,462 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 8,795 current US$ per square kilometre 3,734 current US$ per square kilometre 5,060 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 14,496 current US$ per square kilometre -7,747 current US$ per square kilometre 22,243 current US$ per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Tunisia?
El Salvador, at -14,898 current US$ per square kilometre against -23,361 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Tunisia?
8,463 current US$ per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Tunisia rank globally for changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 167th and Tunisia ranks 170th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Tunisia: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/tunisia/">El Salvador vs Tunisia: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 7,455 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Changes in inventories (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.