Curaçao vs Macau, China: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre
Curaçao
472,471 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Macau, China
9.32 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Curaçao rank
3rd
Macau, China rank
1st
Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Curaçao
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 9.32 million current US$ per square kilometre against 472,471 current US$ per square kilometre in Curaçao, a difference of 8.84 million current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Macau, China's figure about 19.7 times Curaçao's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Macau, China ahead.
Curaçao ranks 3rd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre, Curaçao or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 9.32 million current US$ per square kilometre against 472,471 current US$ per square kilometre in Curaçao as of 2023.
- What is the difference in changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre between Curaçao and Macau, China?
- 8.84 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Macau, China?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Curaçao and Macau, China rank globally for changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre?
- Curaçao ranks 3rd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Changes in inventories (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.