Central African Republic vs Cuba: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
375.46 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
626.2 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Central African Republic rank
98th
Cuba rank
95th

Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Cuba
-20.0k-10.0k010.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 626.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 375.46 current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 250.74 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.7 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Cuba ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 98th and Cuba ranks 95th of 183 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Cuba Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4279 current US$ per square kilometre 674.34 current US$ per square kilometre 673.91 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 10.26 current US$ per square kilometre 538.03 current US$ per square kilometre 527.76 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 15.39 current US$ per square kilometre -4,183 current US$ per square kilometre 4,198 current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre 3,800 current US$ per square kilometre 3,799 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 97.72 current US$ per square kilometre 5,461 current US$ per square kilometre 5,363 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 287.63 current US$ per square kilometre 626.2 current US$ per square kilometre 338.58 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Cuba?
Cuba, at 626.2 current US$ per square kilometre against 375.46 current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2020.
What is the difference in changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Cuba?
250.74 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Cuba?
43 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2020.
How do Central African Republic and Cuba rank globally for changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 98th and Cuba ranks 95th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Cuba: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/cuba/">Central African Republic vs Cuba: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 7,455 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Changes in inventories (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.