How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Tajikistan?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Tajikistan: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre

Argentina

2,110 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Tajikistan

2,956 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Argentina rank

75th

Tajikistan rank

72nd

Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre over time

Argentina
Tajikistan

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 2,956 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,110 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 846 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.4 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Argentina ranks 75th and Tajikistan ranks 72nd of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Tajikistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	738.3 current US$ per square kilometre	887.3 current US$ per square kilometre	149 current US$ per square kilometre	Tajikistan
2000s	629.57 current US$ per square kilometre	206.35 current US$ per square kilometre	423.22 current US$ per square kilometre	Argentina
2010s	2,972 current US$ per square kilometre	796.26 current US$ per square kilometre	2,175 current US$ per square kilometre	Argentina
2020s	789.04 current US$ per square kilometre	2,797 current US$ per square kilometre	2,008 current US$ per square kilometre	Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Tajikistan?: Tajikistan, at 2,956 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,110 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Tajikistan?: 846 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Tajikistan?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Tajikistan rank globally for changes in inventories (current us$), per square kilometre?: Argentina ranks 75th and Tajikistan ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Tajikistan: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/tajikistan/">Argentina vs Tajikistan: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Changes in inventories (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 183 places, 7,455 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 06 September 2026

Changes in inventories (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.