Singapore vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre

Singapore
-7.10 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
-3.67 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
178th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
175th

Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Singapore
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-20.0M-10.0M010.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports -3.67 million current LCU per square kilometre against -7.10 million current LCU per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 3.43 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 178th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 175th of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s -1.46 million current LCU per square kilometre -24,666 current LCU per square kilometre 1.44 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s -3.77 million current LCU per square kilometre 9,862 current LCU per square kilometre 3.78 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 8.54 million current LCU per square kilometre -630,852 current LCU per square kilometre 9.17 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 9.49 million current LCU per square kilometre -3.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.85 million current LCU per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre, Singapore or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at -3.67 million current LCU per square kilometre against -7.10 million current LCU per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre between Singapore and Tanzania, United Republic of?
3.43 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Singapore ranks 178th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 175th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/singapore/tanzania/">Singapore vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 7,458 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Changes in inventories (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.