Netherlands vs Tunisia: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre

Netherlands
-82,952 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
-72,562 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands rank
159th
Tunisia rank
158th

Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Netherlands
  • Tunisia
-200.0k0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196519942023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports -72,562 current LCU per square kilometre against -82,952 current LCU per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 10,390 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Netherlands ahead.

Netherlands ranks 159th and Tunisia ranks 158th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 58,252 current LCU per square kilometre 35.4 current LCU per square kilometre 58,217 current LCU per square kilometre Netherlands
1970s 21,970 current LCU per square kilometre 106.85 current LCU per square kilometre 21,863 current LCU per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s -553.37 current LCU per square kilometre 563.14 current LCU per square kilometre 1,117 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 64,276 current LCU per square kilometre 960.99 current LCU per square kilometre 63,315 current LCU per square kilometre Netherlands
2000s 5,166 current LCU per square kilometre 1,680 current LCU per square kilometre 3,486 current LCU per square kilometre Netherlands
2010s 81,801 current LCU per square kilometre 7,376 current LCU per square kilometre 74,426 current LCU per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 260,514 current LCU per square kilometre -23,428 current LCU per square kilometre 283,942 current LCU per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre, Netherlands or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at -72,562 current LCU per square kilometre against -82,952 current LCU per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2023.
What is the difference in changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre between Netherlands and Tunisia?
10,390 current LCU per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Tunisia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2023.
How do Netherlands and Tunisia rank globally for changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Netherlands ranks 159th and Tunisia ranks 158th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs Tunisia: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/netherlands/tunisia/">Netherlands vs Tunisia: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 7,458 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Changes in inventories (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.