Mauritania vs Panama: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre

Mauritania
77,997 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
62,978 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
61st
Panama rank
63rd

Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Panama
-20.0k020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 77,997 current LCU per square kilometre against 62,978 current LCU per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 15,019 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Mauritania ranks 61st and Panama ranks 63rd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Panama Difference Ahead
1960s -261.37 current LCU per square kilometre 1,289 current LCU per square kilometre 1,551 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
1970s -541.49 current LCU per square kilometre 4,516 current LCU per square kilometre 5,057 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
1980s -2,453 current LCU per square kilometre 5,398 current LCU per square kilometre 7,851 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
1990s -5,953 current LCU per square kilometre 12,024 current LCU per square kilometre 17,977 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2000s -8,844 current LCU per square kilometre 16,382 current LCU per square kilometre 25,226 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2010s 17,562 current LCU per square kilometre 25,049 current LCU per square kilometre 7,488 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2020s 56,321 current LCU per square kilometre 41,184 current LCU per square kilometre 15,137 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Panama?
Mauritania, at 77,997 current LCU per square kilometre against 62,978 current LCU per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Panama?
15,019 current LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Panama rank globally for changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 61st and Panama ranks 63rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Panama: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/panama/">Mauritania vs Panama: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 7,458 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Changes in inventories (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.