Chile vs Costa Rica: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
-4.04 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
-7.42 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
176th
Costa Rica rank
179th

Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Costa Rica
-10.0M-5.0M05.0M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports -4.04 million current LCU per square kilometre against -7.42 million current LCU per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 3.38 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Chile ranks 176th and Costa Rica ranks 179th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Costa Rica in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3338 current LCU per square kilometre 903.73 current LCU per square kilometre 903.4 current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 5,464 current LCU per square kilometre 2,173 current LCU per square kilometre 3,291 current LCU per square kilometre Chile
1980s 81,237 current LCU per square kilometre 226,979 current LCU per square kilometre 145,741 current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 453,896 current LCU per square kilometre 203,086 current LCU per square kilometre 250,810 current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 652,545 current LCU per square kilometre -491,331 current LCU per square kilometre 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.51 million current LCU per square kilometre -916,492 current LCU per square kilometre 2.42 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s -1.24 million current LCU per square kilometre 614,022 current LCU per square kilometre 1.85 million current LCU per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Costa Rica?
Chile, at -4.04 million current LCU per square kilometre against -7.42 million current LCU per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Costa Rica?
3.38 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for changes in inventories (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 176th and Costa Rica ranks 179th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Costa Rica: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/changes-in-inventories-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/costa-rica/">Chile vs Costa Rica: Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Changes in inventories (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 7,458 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Changes in inventories (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.