Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: Capital stock, Private sector … Private square kilometre Current

Equatorial Guinea
0.4735 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Maldives
0.4183 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
23rd
Maldives rank
24th

Capital stock, Private sector … Private square kilometre Current over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Maldives
00.10.20.30.40.5197019942019

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.4735 units per square kilometre against 0.4183 units per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 0.0552 units per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Maldives ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 23rd and Maldives ranks 24th of 175 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Maldives in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Maldives Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0008 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 0.0019 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0089 units per square kilometre 0.0113 units per square kilometre 0.0024 units per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 0.1168 units per square kilometre 0.051 units per square kilometre 0.0659 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.4401 units per square kilometre 0.2574 units per square kilometre 0.1827 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capital stock, private sector, current prices, domestic currency, per, Equatorial Guinea or Maldives?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.4735 units per square kilometre against 0.4183 units per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2019.
What is the difference in capital stock, private sector, current prices, domestic currency, per between Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
0.0552 units per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Maldives rank globally for capital stock, private sector, current prices, domestic currency, per?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 23rd and Maldives ranks 24th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capital stock, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: Capital stock, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/capital-stock-private-sector-current-prices-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/capital-stock-private-sector-current-prices-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/maldives/">Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: Capital stock, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capital stock, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 7,873 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Capital stock, Private sector, Current prices, Domestic currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.