Latvia vs Malaysia: Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices … unit GDP Purchasing

Latvia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Malaysia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Latvia rank
57th
Malaysia rank
56th

Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices … unit GDP Purchasing over time

  • Latvia
  • Malaysia
00000196019892019

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 57th and Malaysia ranks 56th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Malaysia
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Malaysia
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capital stock, private sector, constant prices, purchasing power, Latvia or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2019.
What is the difference in capital stock, private sector, constant prices, purchasing power between Latvia and Malaysia?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malaysia?
25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2019.
How do Latvia and Malaysia rank globally for capital stock, private sector, constant prices, purchasing power?
Latvia ranks 57th and Malaysia ranks 56th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Malaysia: Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/capital-stock-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-international-3/latvia/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/capital-stock-private-sector-constant-prices-purchasing-power-parity-ppp-international-3/latvia/malaysia/">Latvia vs Malaysia: Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 9,025 data points, 1960–2019
Last refreshed

Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 2017 divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.