Lithuania vs Chinese Taipei: Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP
Lithuania
145.95
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
146.07
in 2019
Lithuania rank
96th
Chinese Taipei rank
95th
Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP over time
- Lithuania
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 146.07 against 145.95 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.12.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Lithuania ranks 96th and Chinese Taipei ranks 95th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Chinese Taipei in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 117.08 | 102.48 | 14.6 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 127.77 | 140.15 | 12.38 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 145.95 | 143.03 | 2.92 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capital stock, private sector, constant prices, percent of gdp, Lithuania or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 146.07 against 145.95 in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in capital stock, private sector, constant prices, percent of gdp between Lithuania and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.12, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Chinese Taipei?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Chinese Taipei rank globally for capital stock, private sector, constant prices, percent of gdp?
- Lithuania ranks 96th and Chinese Taipei ranks 95th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Capital stock, Private sector, Constant prices, Percent of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides comprehensive data for investment and capital stock for the general government, private sector and public-private partnerships, across the Fund member countries.