Mozambique vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Balanced trade in services

Mozambique
1.2 US dollars, exchange rate converted
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
1.15 US dollars, exchange rate converted
in 2024
Mozambique rank
108th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
111th

Balanced trade in services over time

  • Mozambique
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.511.52200520142024

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 1.2 US dollars, exchange rate converted against 1.15 US dollars, exchange rate converted in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.05 US dollars, exchange rate converted.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Mozambique ranks 108th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 111th of 174 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 0.5619 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.6377 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.0758 US dollars, exchange rate converted Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 1.36 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.9366 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.423 US dollars, exchange rate converted Mozambique
2020s 1.08 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.8966 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.1838 US dollars, exchange rate converted Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher balanced trade in services, Mozambique or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Mozambique, at 1.2 US dollars, exchange rate converted against 1.15 US dollars, exchange rate converted in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in balanced trade in services between Mozambique and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.05 US dollars, exchange rate converted, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tanzania, United Republic of?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Mozambique and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for balanced trade in services?
Mozambique ranks 108th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 111th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Balanced trade in services (BaTIS). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Balanced trade in services. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/balanced-trade-in-services-batis/mozambique/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/balanced-trade-in-services-batis/mozambique/tanzania/">Mozambique vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Balanced trade in services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Balanced trade in services (BaTIS)
Unit
US dollars, exchange rate converted
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
200 places, 3,969 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The OECD-WTO Balanced Trade in Services (BaTIS) dataset is a complete, consistent, and balanced matrix of international trade in services statistics (ITSS). It contains annual bilateral data covering 202 reporters and partners, broken down by total services and 26 EBOPS 2010 (BPM6) categories from 2005 to 2024. BaTIS is the result of joint efforts by the OECD and WTO. Two main features enable BaTIS to stand out as the international benchmark for any analysis on international trade in services: BaTIS is complete and consistent. At present, only around 65% of world trade in services is bilaterally specified, and the percentage is even lower for the individual service categories. The OECD-WTO methodology leverages all available official statistics and combines them with estimations and adjustments to provide users with a complete matrix covering virtually all economies in the world. BaTIS is balanced. To resolve the asymmetries between reported and mirror flows, exports and imports are reconciled by calculating a symmetry-index weighted average between the two, following a similar approach to that developed for international merchandise trade statistics. Batis provides three measures for each trade flow (under the ‘adjustment’ dimension): Reported. Reflects the value officially reported by the country (where available), some values are rescaled to fit world totals. Adjusted and/or imputed. Reflects, in addition to the reported values, any adjustments made to ensure internal consistency as well as the estimations made by the OECD-WTO to fill in the gaps in the reported information. Balanced. Reflects the reconciled bilateral trade flow, where exports equal mirror imports. Official information on bilateral trade flows was collected from OECD, Eurostat, national sources as well as UNSD. The WTO-UNCTAD trade in services dataset, based on a number of primary sources complemented with estimations, was the main source for data with partner world. The BaTIS dataset can be used as a stand-alone input for economic analysis and policy-making. In addition, balanced trade in services data form an essential input to the OECD Trade in Value Added (TiVA) initiative, for which a balanced view of international trade is crucial. BaTIS is intended to be regularly updated and constantly improved as new data become available. For more information on the methodology, please refer to the technical paper accompanying this dataset The OECD-WTO Balanced Trade in Services (BaTIS) For more information on balanced trade statistics, please go to the topic related OECD page Balanced trade statistics Users are encouraged to send their questions, or to signal any apparent errors, regarding this database to STAT.Contact@oecd.org https://www.oecd.org/en/about/directorates/statistics-and-data-directorate.html