Montserrat vs Tonga: Balanced trade in services

Montserrat
0.0692 US dollars, exchange rate converted
in 2024
Tonga
0.1133 US dollars, exchange rate converted
in 2024
Montserrat rank
170th
Tonga rank
167th

Balanced trade in services over time

  • Montserrat
  • Tonga
0.040.060.080.10.12200520142024

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 0.1133 US dollars, exchange rate converted against 0.0692 US dollars, exchange rate converted in Montserrat, a difference of 0.0441 US dollars, exchange rate converted.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.6 times Montserrat's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Montserrat ahead.

Montserrat ranks 170th and Tonga ranks 167th of 174 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Montserrat averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montserrat Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0446 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.0442 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.0004 US dollars, exchange rate converted Montserrat
2010s 0.0474 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.0636 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.0161 US dollars, exchange rate converted Tonga
2020s 0.0533 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.0848 US dollars, exchange rate converted 0.0315 US dollars, exchange rate converted Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher balanced trade in services, Montserrat or Tonga?
Tonga, at 0.1133 US dollars, exchange rate converted against 0.0692 US dollars, exchange rate converted in Montserrat as of 2024.
What is the difference in balanced trade in services between Montserrat and Tonga?
0.0441 US dollars, exchange rate converted, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montserrat and Tonga?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Montserrat and Tonga rank globally for balanced trade in services?
Montserrat ranks 170th and Tonga ranks 167th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Balanced trade in services (BaTIS). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montserrat vs Tonga: Balanced trade in services. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/balanced-trade-in-services-batis/montserrat/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/balanced-trade-in-services-batis/montserrat/tonga/">Montserrat vs Tonga: Balanced trade in services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Balanced trade in services (BaTIS)
Unit
US dollars, exchange rate converted
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
200 places, 3,969 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The OECD-WTO Balanced Trade in Services (BaTIS) dataset is a complete, consistent, and balanced matrix of international trade in services statistics (ITSS). It contains annual bilateral data covering 202 reporters and partners, broken down by total services and 26 EBOPS 2010 (BPM6) categories from 2005 to 2024. BaTIS is the result of joint efforts by the OECD and WTO. Two main features enable BaTIS to stand out as the international benchmark for any analysis on international trade in services: BaTIS is complete and consistent. At present, only around 65% of world trade in services is bilaterally specified, and the percentage is even lower for the individual service categories. The OECD-WTO methodology leverages all available official statistics and combines them with estimations and adjustments to provide users with a complete matrix covering virtually all economies in the world. BaTIS is balanced. To resolve the asymmetries between reported and mirror flows, exports and imports are reconciled by calculating a symmetry-index weighted average between the two, following a similar approach to that developed for international merchandise trade statistics. Batis provides three measures for each trade flow (under the ‘adjustment’ dimension): Reported. Reflects the value officially reported by the country (where available), some values are rescaled to fit world totals. Adjusted and/or imputed. Reflects, in addition to the reported values, any adjustments made to ensure internal consistency as well as the estimations made by the OECD-WTO to fill in the gaps in the reported information. Balanced. Reflects the reconciled bilateral trade flow, where exports equal mirror imports. Official information on bilateral trade flows was collected from OECD, Eurostat, national sources as well as UNSD. The WTO-UNCTAD trade in services dataset, based on a number of primary sources complemented with estimations, was the main source for data with partner world. The BaTIS dataset can be used as a stand-alone input for economic analysis and policy-making. In addition, balanced trade in services data form an essential input to the OECD Trade in Value Added (TiVA) initiative, for which a balanced view of international trade is crucial. BaTIS is intended to be regularly updated and constantly improved as new data become available. For more information on the methodology, please refer to the technical paper accompanying this dataset The OECD-WTO Balanced Trade in Services (BaTIS) For more information on balanced trade statistics, please go to the topic related OECD page Balanced trade statistics Users are encouraged to send their questions, or to signal any apparent errors, regarding this database to STAT.Contact@oecd.org https://www.oecd.org/en/about/directorates/statistics-and-data-directorate.html