Sub-Saharan Africa vs Sudan: Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a
Sub-Saharan Africa
8.4%
in 2025
Sudan
21.2%
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st
Sudan rank
4th
Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 21.2% against 8.4% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 12.8%.
That makes Sudan's figure about 2.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 4th of 8 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.1% | 6.9% | 2.2% | Sub-Saharan Africa |
| 2020s | 8.2% | 10.4% | 2.1% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a, Sub-Saharan Africa or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 21.2% against 8.4% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a between Sub-Saharan Africa and Sudan?
- 12.8%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Sudan rank globally for average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a?
- Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 4th of 8 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.