South Africa vs Thailand: Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a
South Africa
6.0%
in 2025
Thailand
5.8%
in 2025
South Africa rank
52nd
Thailand rank
55th
Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a over time
- South Africa
- Thailand
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 6.0% against 5.8% in Thailand, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 55th of 110 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.1% | 8.1% | 0.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 7.3% | 6.6% | 0.6% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a, South Africa or Thailand?
- South Africa, at 6.0% against 5.8% in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a between South Africa and Thailand?
- 0.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Thailand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do South Africa and Thailand rank globally for average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a?
- South Africa ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 55th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.