Malawi vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a
Malawi
31.5%
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
8.4%
in 2025
Malawi rank
1st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
1st
Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a over time
- Malawi
- Sub-Saharan Africa
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 31.5% against 8.4% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 23.1%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 3.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 110 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sub-Saharan Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.5% | 9.9% | 4.6% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 12.4% | 8.2% | 4.2% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a, Malawi or Sub-Saharan Africa?
- Malawi, at 31.5% against 8.4% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a between Malawi and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 23.1%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sub-Saharan Africa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a?
- Malawi ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.