Guatemala vs Malaysia: Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a
Guatemala
4.2%
in 2025
Malaysia
4.2%
in 2025
Guatemala rank
87th
Malaysia rank
86th
Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a over time
- Guatemala
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 4.2% against 4.2% in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Malaysia ahead.
Guatemala ranks 87th and Malaysia ranks 86th of 110 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.9% | 6.8% | 2.0% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 4.4% | 4.7% | 0.3% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a, Guatemala or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 4.2% against 4.2% in Guatemala as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a between Guatemala and Malaysia?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malaysia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Guatemala and Malaysia rank globally for average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a?
- Guatemala ranks 87th and Malaysia ranks 86th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.