El Salvador vs Nepal: Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a
El Salvador
3.5%
in 2025
Nepal
3.5%
in 2025
El Salvador rank
98th
Nepal rank
97th
Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a over time
- El Salvador
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 3.5% against 3.5% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Nepal ahead.
El Salvador ranks 98th and Nepal ranks 97th of 110 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.1% | 4.7% | 0.7% | Nepal |
| 2020s | 3.8% | 3.9% | 0.1% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a, El Salvador or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 3.5% against 3.5% in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a between El Salvador and Nepal?
- 0.0%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Nepal?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Nepal rank globally for average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a?
- El Salvador ranks 98th and Nepal ranks 97th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.