Ecuador vs South Africa: Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a
Ecuador
6.0%
in 2025
South Africa
6.0%
in 2025
Ecuador rank
49th
South Africa rank
52nd
Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 6.0% against 6.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 49th and South Africa ranks 52nd of 110 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.3% | 8.1% | 3.8% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 5.3% | 7.3% | 2.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a, Ecuador or South Africa?
- Ecuador, at 6.0% against 6.0% in South Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a?
- Ecuador ranks 49th and South Africa ranks 52nd of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.