China vs Kosovo: Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a
China
7.3%
in 2025
Kosovo
7.5%
in 2025
China rank
40th
Kosovo rank
37th
Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a over time
- China
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 7.5% against 7.3% in China, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was China ahead.
China ranks 40th and Kosovo ranks 37th of 110 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.0% | 7.2% | 1.8% | China |
| 2020s | 7.1% | 6.3% | 0.8% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a, China or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at 7.5% against 7.3% in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a between China and Kosovo?
- 0.2%, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kosovo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do China and Kosovo rank globally for average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a?
- China ranks 40th and Kosovo ranks 37th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.