Bangladesh vs China: Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a
Bangladesh
7.3%
in 2025
China
7.3%
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
41st
China rank
40th
Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a over time
- Bangladesh
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 7.3% against 7.3% in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was China ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 41st and China ranks 40th of 110 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.3% | 9.8% | 5.5% | China |
| 2020s | 6.6% | 7.1% | 0.5% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a, Bangladesh or China?
- China, at 7.3% against 7.3% in Bangladesh as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a between Bangladesh and China?
- 0.0%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and China?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and China rank globally for average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a?
- Bangladesh ranks 41st and China ranks 40th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.